Emily L. Pratt, Reich College of Education, Appalachian State University

Home Page

Cover Page

T.O.C by Artifact

T.O.C. by  Tech Competency

T.O.C. by INTASC Principles
 

Artifact #1

Artifact # 2

Artifact # 3

Artifact # 4

Artifact # 5

Artifact # 6

Artifact # 7

Artifact # 8

Artifact # 9

Artifact # 10

Artifact # 11

Artifact # 12

Artifact # 13

Artifact # 14

Artifact # 15

ISTE National Educational Technology Standards

INTASC Principles

References

Artifact
     Spelling Assessments and Word Study Lesson:  This group of spelling papers were used for assessment and evaluation purposes.  From the Spelling Assessment, a Word Study Lesson was designed for a particular student.

Context
     While learning about strategies to assess students in the area of reading in my RE 3900 class, I used this set of papers to practice my assessment skills then designed an appropriate lesson for one particular student.

Impact
     As an educator, I have to know how to first assess my students to determine the best instructional strategies to use.  In this instance, I graded a spelling assessment, and designed an appropriate Word Study that focused on the needs of the learner. 

Alignment
     The first thing I did when looking at the Spelling Assessments was to grade them, then evaluate what stage of phonic development each student was in.  I focused on one student and studied the particular stage of development he was in, noting what in particular he was having difficulties with.  I researched possible lessons that I could use to help the student learn the rules for "doubling" words when adding suffixes and rules for using "-el" verses "-le" at the end of a word.  All these concepts build upon the student's previous knowledge to introduce new concepts of sylable junctures (prefixes and suffixes).  The lesson consisted of two Word Sorts, an activity where the student is responsibile for sorting words into appropriate categories according to established patterns.  During this activity, the student may be asked why he placed certain words in a particular category, encouraging the student to verbalize his reasoning skills.  The two sorts focused on the two areas that the student was having difficulties with.  The lesson also had two different games, again with each one focusing on the two areas of difficulty.  (INTASC Principle 2)
     When designing this lesson, I had to have an understanding of where this student was in her learning.  I was able to assess this by using a specific tool, the Spelling Assessment, from which I was able to structure a specific lesson to fit that child's educational needs.  The games that were used in the lesson will help make the concepts more practical for the student.  (INTASC Principle 1)
     Throughout this lesson, there are many possibilities for me to evaluate and assess the student's learning, both formally and informally.  The first assessment, the Spelling Assessment, was a good formal assessment to design a lesson from.  As the student is sorting the words into the appropriate category, I can mentally evaluate the student's performance and then ask the student why he chose to place the words as he did.  Likewise, the games are a wonderful opportunity for me to formally assess the student as he plays with me or a small group of his peers and record how he is progressing.  At various points within the school-year, I would give the Spelling Assessment again and note his progress or lack thereof.  (INTASC Principle 8)