Casey E. Bowen, Reich College of Education, Appalachian State University

Home Page

Cover Page

T.O.C by Artifact

T.O.C. by  Tech Competency

T.O.C. by INTASC Principles
 

 Artifact #1

Artifact # 2

Artifact # 3

Artifact # 4

Artifact # 5

Artifact # 6

Artifact # 7

Artifact # 8

Artifact # 9

Artifact # 10

Artifact # 11

Artifact # 12

Artifact # 13

Artifact # 14

Artifact # 15

NC ETSI Advanced Competencies

INTASC Principles

References

software evalution

Context:
I reviewed the educational software, Leap Ahead 3rd Grade published by The Learning Company, Inc. I evaluated this particular software noting its content description, instructional type, and strengths and weaknesses in a Microsoft Word Document.  The evaluation also includes web links to lesson plans that can be integrated when using the software in the classroom.

Impact:
Participating in a software evaluation provides a strong outlook on using comptuer software as an additional learning aid in the classroom.  This activity promotes the ability to use educational software and how to evaluate it appropriately in order for students to use it effectively. 

Alignment:
The Technology Competencies that are met through this activity include accessing resources to planning instruction via telecommunications (10.3). I located, evaluated, and selected appropriate teaching and learning resources and curriculum materials for the content area and target audience (10.6). I used technology in the subject area for learning and as a medium for communications as well as presenting the content to that it is comprehensible to others (11.1 and 11.2). I used technology-based tools that are specific to the discipline and used it to facilitate teaching strategies (11.3 and 11.4). I collected information on the software using computers fostering student learning (12.2). There are physical settings and organizational strategies that support active student involvment, inquiry, and collaboration as we evaluated the software (12.4 and 12.5). I selected and created learning experiences that are appropriate for the curriculum goals relevant to learners, supporting learner expression using media communication tools (12.7). As I evaluated the software, I took into consideration media and technology to address differences in children's learning and performance noting children with special needs as well as children that do not use English as a primary language (13.1, 13.2, and 13.3). I also ensured equal access to media and technology resources for all students that would use the chosen software in the classroom (14.1). 

The INTASC Principle 3 was met in this evaluation process of software due to understanding how students differ in their approaches to learning while creating instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners when using software in the classroom.